Category Archives: EPET

All posts related to my own coursework in MSUs Ed Psych/Ed Tech doctoral program.

Phd update: reflection and goals

Summer is coming to an end and as I wrap up both my own courses and the course I’ve assisted in this summer semester, I thought I would pause to reflect and identify places for moving forward on this journey.

I blogged a bit this summer about my own growth as a researcher, which was facilitated by two of the three  courses I took this summer. In one course, I developed a research proposal that will function as my practicum proposal. In my program, the practicum is part of the “Research Apprenticeship” which follows roughly the same process as the dissertation: proposal, oral presentation of proposal to get approval, carrying out research, writing up research, defending research.  In another course, we focused on developing a literature review: another essential skill for the dissertation process (and for being an academic in general).

At the end of this process, I feel like I’ve grown a lot as a writer, first and foremost. Academic writing is a tricky thing, and  the feedback and guidance of both my instructors and advisor were invaluable. Writing is thinking, and I know that my research brain has developed along with my prose. I am not ashamed to say that I am in love with my research proposal, and I am thrilled that I’ve been able to design a study that gets at research questions that I find interesting and sustaining. I spent a lot of this year seemingly unfocused (much to the worry of my mentors in the program: focus, Andrea, focus! was the most common thing I heard), but I find myself back at the same questions that I articulated in my application to school, but they are more focused as well as being functional (as in: a person could actually design a study to answer them).  After considering other questions and ideas, in the end I feel like the topics I am looking at now are ones I could stick with over the course of not only my practicum, but could develop into additional studies that could be the focus of my dissertation. To be frank, I don’t have time to change my mind, so I wanted to be sure that I really liked what I am doing. And I do. (Additionally, once I get IRB approval for what I am proposing, I plan to post everything here on the site).

If year one was about experiencing school, year two will be all about strategy.  Every decision must consider two things: first, is this decision going to help me finish faster? and secondly, does this decision help me get a job when I am finished?  Spring 2012 brings defending my practicum, completing comprehensive exams, and developing my dissertation proposal. I want all my ducks in a row to get moving as quickly as possible into dissertation mode.

So here are the goals:

  • move from exploration to professionalization
  • solidify my career goals: make appointment at Career Services, develop a non-academic resume and cover letter (just in case!), keep an eye out for job postings to understand what is out there for people with my eventual degree.
  • related to this, add a line to my CV every month (I know this sounds a little crazy, but I figure there is no harm in keeping this a focus every month, and wouldn’t it be awesome if I pulled it off? I heard this was something that folks on the tenure-track do, so it seemed like a good goal.)
  • identify something every month that gets me to graduation faster: read dissertations from graduates of the program, etc,
  • I also have a long list of brilliant people at my university that I have yet to meet. I am making it a priority to meet them this year.

Anything else?

Writing things for school

Loosely based on my recent experiences with writing a research proposal as a requirement for my program:

1. Discuss idea with mentors.

2. Write things.

3. Send writing to mentors.

4. Get feedback.

5. Write again.

6. Feel stupid.

7. Delete things.

8. Weep.

9. Delete more things.

10. Have breakthrough! Feel smug.

11. Write furiously.

12. Send to mentors.

13. Receive confusing feedback.

14. Lie on the floor.

15. Write more things. Repeat 1-14.

 

 

 

Thar’s gold in them thar hills

Pomona Mining Shack

CC Super Hanz

If you’ve been following along on this blog lately, you already know that right now I am in the inception stage of plotting my research practicum: a study that I will conduct during this second year of my program. This is seen as sort of a “mini-dissertation” complete with a round of convincing a committee that your proposal is a good one, all the way to defending the results when you are done.

I am a social networking gal, and I’ve been obsessed with Penuel et.al’s examination of teachers’ interactions in a school wherein they took a social capital approach.  I keep coming back to this idea, and every time I read this study I think: I WANT. Now, that being said, this IS NOT EASY TO DO AT ALL.  It is even harder considering I am a baby researcher and there is one of me, and this study had four really amazing researchers working on it. The whole section of analysis done by Ken Frank is all greek to me (haha! stats joke!), for I am not anywhere close to able to imagine how they go from point A to point B in this analysis. Fingers crossed I get to take his class before I’m done: Survey Design was offered at the same time and I really needed to take that one, too. Plus, I’ve been told that the other research methods course I’ll be taking (advanced multivariate) will assist me in better understanding the social network analysis.

At any rate, in my attempt to bite off a chunk of this type of work, I found some amazing databases on our state of Michigan Department of Education website, including a database of tech proficient teachers. I was thrilled. I am interested mainly in tech adoption by teachers, and here was one measure of tech proficiency for the entire state!  With all the other data collected on teachers in the state, I thought I could really do some fun analysis, checking for correlations with all sorts of other factors. It was gold!

Then I sat down with my advisor and we worked on my crazy spreadsheets, got them aligned in SPSS, and I realized: oh crap, there are ALL sorts of problems with this data.  These are not tiny limitations, these are they types of flaws wherein a lot of work will go into me knowing basically nothing about the rates of tech proficiency in the state of Michigan. D’oh!  Once I had climbed the hill and started digging, I realized those shiny objects were of little value.

Good thing I had a backup plan.

The lesson I am learning is that sometimes in research, my plans are not as good as I think they are. In my lit review, I stumble across the perfect article based on title and abstract, only to be let down in the reading of it. In my research proposal, I am on method SEVEN now as I shed each one for this or that fatal flaw. (I admit it stung a little when my advisor said, “I can’t even remember what you are studying anymore.” Ouch.  But true, oh so painfully true.).   I can only hope that through this method of thinking, proposing, poking holes, finding flaws, and starting over again I will end up with something I can get approved, carry out, and defend.  I would really like to discover the  magic formula so that the process could  become more efficient for me, so if anyone has any suggestions, let me know. I suspect that this is how it goes for everyone. Maybe it’s like learning any process: at first you have the slow, jagged movements of a beginner, and after a while those movements become practiced and fluid. I hope so any way.